Search for: "Steve Vladeck"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,334
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2017, 7:50 am
Still no music, but Steve Vladeck and I have posted Episode 2 of our new National Security Law Podcast, “If You Thought That Last Executive Order Was Controversial…” In it, we discuss President Trump’s new Executive Order on immigration, last weekend’s use of military force in Yemen, and . . . our predictions for the Super Bowl and President Trump’s nominee to the Supreme Court (we recorded yesterday afternoon; Steve's… [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 8:22 am
Steve Vladeck proposes as a solution to the problems of shadow dockets, emergency litigation, and plaintiffs shopping for one judge (often in a single district or division) to issue the injunction that will provide the basis for emergency relief. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:49 pm
• Leah Litman and Steve Vladeck argue discuss the constitutional rights that could be on the chopping block if the Dobbs draft becomes the Court's opinion, with the provocative headline "The Biggest Lie Conservative Defenders of Alito's Leaked Opinion Are Telling. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:15 am
And we’re back, with co-hosts Steve Vladeck and Bobby Chesney breaking down the latest national security law news along with much else. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 4:00 pm
Steve Vladeck is quoted in this Slate article arguing that the district may abstain on Younger/equitable grounds. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:52 am
Tune in as Professor Steve Vladeck and Dean Bobby Chesney chat about (1) the fate of Twitter, (2) the national security implications of the election results, (3) a just-released 2016 NSA IG report, (4) the latest GTMO transfer, (5) Bobby’s just-published Harvard Law Review piece (concerning two SCOTUS cases last year which touched on the state secrets privilege), (6) Steve’s brand-new substack newsletter–One First–exploring all things… [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:13 pm
Vladeck at Balkinization here. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
[Legal scholars Frank Bowman and Steve Vladeck weigh in on Texas's dangerous argument.] [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 6:30 am
Lawfare founder Bobby Chesney and Lawfare contributing editor Steve Vladeck, both of the University of Texas Law School, host the National Security Law Podcast, a weekly deep dive on national security law topics. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 5:37 am
Steve Vladeck and I are thrilled and grateful to the University of Miami School of Law for hosting us. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 12:00 pm
” Steve Vladeck has this post at his “One First” Substack site. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 5:24 am
He’ll be joined by Dechert’s Steve Bradbury, and our own Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 11:33 am
In this Response, I will explain why Professor Vladeck's prediction will also not come to pass It's not clear to me that Hibbitts is totally wrong, even if Steve may be--I'll let Steve answer Anthony directly. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:23 pm
" Today at "Just Security," Steve Vladeck has a blog post that begins, "Later this year, the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2018, 7:02 pm
And at the “Just Security” blog, Steve Vladeck has a post titled “What the Heck is Happening in Al-Nashiri? [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 2:01 am
Benjamin Wittes, Molly Reynolds, Steve Vladeck, David Priess, Susan Hennessey, Scott Anderson, Judd Devermont and Rohini Kurup responded to questions on everything from pardons to prosecuting contractors to ethnic diversity at Lawfare. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:24 pm
Sullivan”: Law professor Steve Vladeck has this essay online at NBC News. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:43 pm
Lawfare contributors Orin Kerr, Stewart Baker, Steve Vladeck, and Paul Rosenzweig joined Benjamin Wittes and Susan Hennessey to go over all the angles. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 8:24 am
"The (Potentially) Monumental Significance of the Jennings Supplemental Briefing Order": Today at "Just Security," Steve Vladeck has a post that begins, "On November 30, the US Supreme Court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 2:55 pm
"Law Clerks and Book Proposals": At "Concurring Opinions," Steve Vladeck has a post that begins, "There's a fairly disturbing (at least to me) book proposal making its way around the e-mail universe, disturbing not because of the subject (the current debate over habeas and the war on terrorism), but because of the occupation of the authors / editors -- two current D.C. [read post]
